1978 Ford Ltd Recall | The Windshield Wiper And Washer System Contains An Incorrect 6 Amp Circuit Breaker Instead Of The 8.25 Amp Circuit Breaker. If The System Is Heavily Loaded, As In The Case Of A

1978 Ford Ltd Electrical System,fuses And Circuit Breakers Recall | Sept 11, 1978

The Windshield Wiper And Washer System Contains An Incorrect 6 Amp Circuit Breaker Instead Of The 8.25 Amp Circuit Breaker. If The System Is Heavily Loaded, As In The Case Of A Partially Dry Windshield, The Motor Current May Exceed The 6 Amp Breaker”s Capacity. This Would Cause The Breaker To Open, Which Would Result In Wiper/washer Failure.. Follwoing Is The Summary Of Corrective Actions Taken: Dealer Will Install The Correct Circuit Breaker Without Charge To Owner.
vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles.system: Electrical; Wiper/washer Circuit Breaker.consequences Of Defect: Wiper/washer Failure In Bad Weather Conditions Couldcontribute To A Vehicle Accident.

This recall was issued on Sept 11, 1978 for 1978 Ford Ltd, manufactured by FORD MOTOR COMPANY, in response to Electrical System,fuses And Circuit Breakers problems.

1978 Ford Ltd Recall |

1978 Ford Ltd Service Brakes, Hydraulic,foundation Components,hoses, Lines/piping, And Fittings Recall | Sept 11, 1978

. Follwoing Is The Summary Of Corrective Actions Taken: Dealer Will Inspect And, If Necessary, Install Protective Shields On The Rebound Bumper Brackets Without Charge To Owner.
vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles.system: Service Brakes; Front Brake Hoses.system: Due To Improper Dimensional Specifications, The Front Brake Hoses Maycontact And Chafe Against The Edges Of The Frame-mounted Rebound Bumperbrackets. Chafing Of The Front Brake Hose May Cause A Brake Fluid Leak Andsubsequent Loss Of Front Wheel Braking Capability.consequences Of Defect: Loss Of Front Wheel Braking Would Cause An Increase Indistance Required To Stop The Vehicle. This Could Lead To Loss Of Vehiclecontrol And An Accident.

This recall was issued on Sept 11, 1978 for 1978 Ford Ltd, manufactured by FORD MOTOR COMPANY, in response to Service Brakes, Hydraulic,foundation Components,hoses, Lines/piping, And Fittings problems.

1978 Ford Ltd Recall | Some Of The Involved Vehicles May Have Been Equipped With Lr78-15 “c” Load Range Truck Tires Instead Of Lr78-15 “b” Load Range Passenger Car Tires. The Wheels Presently On The Involved Vehicles Are Intended

1978 Ford Ltd Tires Recall | Mar 06, 1978

Some Of The Involved Vehicles May Have Been Equipped With Lr78-15 “c” Load Range Truck Tires Instead Of Lr78-15 “b” Load Range Passenger Car Tires. The Wheels Presently On The Involved Vehicles Are Intended For Use With Passenger Vehicle Tires And Were Not Rated For The Higher Maximum Air Pressure And Load Ratings Molded Into The Sidewall Of The Lr78-15 “c” Load Range Truck Tires.. Follwoing Is The Summary Of Corrective Actions Taken: The Dealer Will Inspect And, If Necessary, Replace “c” Load Range Tires With “b” Load Range Tires, Without Charge.
vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles.system: Suspension; Wheels, Tires.consequences Of Defect: Inflation To The Maximum Pressure Stated On Thesidewall Of The “c” Load Range Tire May Produce Wheel Rim Loading Greater Thanthat Intended. The Potential Exists For Wheel Rim Cracking, Resulting In Rapidair Loss, Loss Of Vehicle Control And An Accident.

This recall was issued on Mar 06, 1978 for 1978 Ford Ltd, manufactured by FORD MOTOR COMPANY, in response to Tires problems.

1978 Ford Ltd Recall | The Lower Steering Shaft Assemblies Contain Coupling Rivet Pins Which Were Not Riveted Securely Enough During Manufacture. Consequently One Or Both Of The Pins Could Loosen From The Flange Of The Flexible Coupling During

1978 Ford Ltd Steering,wheel And Handle Bar Recall | Oct 04, 1978

The Lower Steering Shaft Assemblies Contain Coupling Rivet Pins Which Were Not Riveted Securely Enough During Manufacture. Consequently One Or Both Of The Pins Could Loosen From The Flange Of The Flexible Coupling During Vehicle Operation. If One Pin Is Loose, Free Play Would Result. If Both Pins Work Loose, Loss Of Steering Control Would Occur. Also, The Shaft Assembly May Not Contain A Metal Reinforcement Between One Or Both Of The Rivet Pins And The Rubber Flexible Coupling. As A Result, The Rubber Flexible Coupling Could Tear And Produce A Noise Or Loose Feeling In The Steering System.. Follwoing Is The Summary Of Corrective Actions Taken: The Dealer Will Inspect And, If Necessary, Replace The Steering Shaft Assembly, Without Charge To Owner.
vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles.system: Steering; Steering Column Coupling.consequences Of Defect: Loss Of Steering Control Could Cause A Loss Of Vehiclecontrol And An Accident.

This recall was issued on Oct 04, 1978 for 1978 Ford Ltd, manufactured by FORD MOTOR COMPANY, in response to Steering,wheel And Handle Bar problems.

1978 Ford Ltd Recall | One Or More Of The Five Cooling Fan Blades May Have Been Improperly Riveted To The Fan Spider. This Could Allow The Blades To Separate From The Fan During Engine Operation.

1978 Ford Ltd Engine And Engine Cooling,cooling System,fan Recall | Oct 04, 1978

One Or More Of The Five Cooling Fan Blades May Have Been Improperly Riveted To The Fan Spider. This Could Allow The Blades To Separate From The Fan During Engine Operation.. Follwoing Is The Summary Of Corrective Actions Taken: Dealer Will Inspect And, If Necessary, Replace The Engine Cooling Fan, Without Charge.
vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles Equipped With 302 And 351 Cid Enginesand Air Conditioning.system: Engine; Engine Cooling Fan.consequences Of Defect: Separated Blades Could Be Propelled Outwards, Damagingother Engine Components. If The Hood Is Open And The Engine Is Running, Bladefragments Could Fly From The Engine And Injure Nearby Persons.note: Engine Should Not Be Operated With The Hood Open Until The Cooling Fanhas Been Inspected.

This recall was issued on Oct 04, 1978 for 1978 Ford Ltd, manufactured by FORD MOTOR COMPANY, in response to Engine And Engine Cooling,cooling System,fan problems.