2004 Ford Crown Victoria Recall | Certain Police, Commercial, And Passenger Vehicles Sold To Fleets Typically

2004 Ford Crown Victoria Suspension,rear Recall | July 07, 2004

Certain Police, Commercial, And Passenger Vehicles Sold To Fleets Typically Input Higher Loads Into The Vehicle Chassis Overloading The Wheel Bearings And Axles.

This Could Lead To Early Bearing Failure And Ultimately To Axle Shaft Fracture. In The Event Of Axle Shaft Fracture, The Vehicle Would Lose Drive Function And Would Coast To A Stop. Loss Of Drive Function Could Lead To A Crash.

Summary Of Corrective Actions Taken: Dealers Will Replace The Rear Wheel Bearings, Seals,and Axle Shafts. The Recall Began On July 15, 2004. Owners Should Contact Ford At 1-800-392-3673.

Ford Recall No. 04s16. Customers Can Also Contact The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Auto Safety Hotline At 1-888-dash-2-dot ( 1-888-327-4236).

This recall was issued on July 07, 2004 for 2004 Ford Crown Victoria, manufactured by FORD MOTOR COMPANY, in response to Suspension,rear problems.

1985 Ford Tempo Recall | Rear Suspension Control Arm-to-spindle Attachment Bolts May Be Subject To Fracture During Use Of Car.

1985 Ford Tempo Suspension,rear Recall | July 03, 1985

Rear Suspension Control Arm-to-spindle Attachment Bolts May Be Subject To Fracture During Use Of Car. Consequence Of Defect: If Bolts Fracture, Rear Spindle Could Disengage From Control Arm And Possibly Result In Loss Of Control.. Follwoing Is The Summary Of Corrective Actions Taken: Replace Rear Suspension Bolts As Necessary.
vehicle Description: Passenger Cars. System: Rear Suspension Bolts.

This recall was issued on July 03, 1985 for 1985 Ford Tempo, manufactured by FORD MOTOR COMPANY, in response to Suspension,rear problems.

1975 Ford Thunderbird Recall |

1975 Ford Thunderbird Fuel System, Gasoline,carburetor System Recall | Mar 04, 1975

. Follwoing Is The Summary Of Corrective Actions Taken:
ford Campaign No 154.light Trucks Eqtipped With 460 Cid Engine & 4353-4vcarburetor.possibility That The “o” Ring On The Sealing Plug Installed In Thefuel Inlet Cross-channel Of The Carburetor May Experience Loss Of The Sealingplug.should Plug Loss Occur, Fuel Pump Operation Would Cause Gasoline To Bedischarged Onto The Engine Under Pressure.a Strong Fuel Odor Would Resultwith Potential For The Occurence Of An Underhood Fire.(correct By Installingnew Plug Less “o” Ring Using An Epoxy Coating Over Plug And Adjacent Surface).

This recall was issued on Mar 04, 1975 for 1975 Ford Thunderbird, manufactured by FORD MOTOR COMPANY, in response to Fuel System, Gasoline,carburetor System problems.

1977 Ford Fairmont Recall | The Involved Vehicles May Be In Non-compliance To Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 105, “hydraulic Brake Systems”, Due To Installation Of Incorrect Rear Axle Assemblies. Consequently, Early Rear Wheel

1977 Ford Fairmont Suspension,rear Recall | Sept 22, 1977

The Involved Vehicles May Be In Non-compliance To Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 105, “hydraulic Brake Systems”, Due To Installation Of Incorrect Rear Axle Assemblies. Consequently, Early Rear Wheel Lock-up Under Light Loading Conditions Could Result Causing Vehicle Directional Instability. Rear Braking Effectiveness Would Also Be Reduced.. Follwoing Is The Summary Of Corrective Actions Taken: Dealer Will Inspect And, If Necessary, Install The Correct Rear Axle Assembly Without Charge To Owner.
vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles.system: Suspension; Rear Axle Assemblies.consequences Of Defect: Vehicle Directional Instability And Decrease In Rearbraking Action May Cause Loss Of Vehicle Control And An Accident.

This recall was issued on Sept 22, 1977 for 1977 Ford Fairmont, manufactured by FORD MOTOR COMPANY, in response to Suspension,rear problems.

1982 Ford Ltd Recall | The Lower Control Arms May Have Been Manufactured From Steel With Material Thickness Below The Minimum Specifications For Police Duty. This Could Lead To Cracks Developing In The Control Arms, And Eventually,

1982 Ford Ltd Suspension,rear Recall | Dec 28, 1982

The Lower Control Arms May Have Been Manufactured From Steel With Material Thickness Below The Minimum Specifications For Police Duty. This Could Lead To Cracks Developing In The Control Arms, And Eventually, The Possibility Of Fracture Of An Arm.. Follwoing Is The Summary Of Corrective Actions Taken: The Dealer Will Install New Rear Suspension Lower Control Arms On Both Sides Of The Vehicle Without Charge.
vehicle Description: Passenger Vehicles Equipped For Police Duty.system: Rear Suspension; Lower Control Arms.consequences Of Defect: Fracture Can Occur Without Prior Warning And Couldadversely Affect Vehicle Steering Control. Under Certain Circumstances,particularly In High Speed Pursuit Driving, Fracture Of A Control Arm Maycreate The Potential For A Vehicle Accident.

This recall was issued on Dec 28, 1982 for 1982 Ford Ltd, manufactured by FORD MOTOR COMPANY, in response to Suspension,rear problems.

1985 Ford Tempo Recall | Rear Supension Control Arm-to-spindle Attachment Bolts May Be Subject To Fracture Causing The Rear Spindle To Separate During Use Of Car.

1985 Ford Tempo Suspension,rear Recall | Nov 05, 1985

Rear Supension Control Arm-to-spindle Attachment Bolts May Be Subject To Fracture Causing The Rear Spindle To Separate During Use Of Car. Consequence Of Defect: If Bolts Fracture And Rear Spindle Disengages From Control Arm, Loss Of Control Will Be Experience Which May Result In An Accident.. Follwoing Is The Summary Of Corrective Actions Taken: Replace Rear Suspension Bolts As Necessary.
system: Rear Suspension Bolts. Vehicle Description: Passenger Cars. This Is An Addendum The Nhtsa Recall Number 85v086000.

This recall was issued on Nov 05, 1985 for 1985 Ford Tempo, manufactured by FORD MOTOR COMPANY, in response to Suspension,rear problems.

1996 Ford Expedition Recall | The Rear Axle Track Bar Bracket Can Separate From The Frame Due To Missing Welds Or Inadequate Weld Penetration.

1996 Ford Expedition Suspension,rear Recall | Dec 18, 1996

The Rear Axle Track Bar Bracket Can Separate From The Frame Due To Missing Welds Or Inadequate Weld Penetration.if Both Brackets Separate, The Rear Axle Can Move Laterally Until The Tires Contact Either The Frame Or The Wheelhouse Resulting In Either Tire Damage Or A Significant Reduction In Vehicle Handling Performance.. Follwoing Is The Summary Of Corrective Actions Taken: Dealers Will Install A Track Bar Bracket Reinforcement Kit And Inspection Of The Axle Tubes. The Suspect Axle Tubes Do Not Have A Stamped Date Code On The Tube. Axles Without Date Codes On The Tubes Will Be Replaced.
owner Notification:owner Notification Will Begin January 20, 1997. Note:owners Who Take Their Vehicles To An Authorized Dealer On An Agreed Upon Service Date And Do Not Receive The Free Remedy Within A Reasonable Time Should Contact Ford At 1-800-392-3673.also Contact The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Auto Safety Hotline At 1-800-424-9393.

This recall was issued on Dec 18, 1996 for 1996 Ford Expedition, manufactured by FORD MOTOR COMPANY, in response to Suspension,rear problems.